William Chuang —
Research Portfolio

Independent researcher working at the intersection of AI architecture, policy, and the mathematical foundations of intelligence. Primary interests: AI-assisted public health and national security. This site uses LLM (large language model) to refer to systems like GPT‑4/5, Claude, and Gemini throughout, Taiwan–Holy See–PRC diplomacy, operator-theoretic methods in finance and learning, and post-quantum cryptography. Founder, Logarchéon Inc.

Read also: About (biography & vocation) · Logarchéon (architecture overview)

4th Degree K of C · Fr. McGivney Assembly Auxiliary & Provisional Member, Order of Malta Logarchéon Inc. · Founded 2024 9+ Patent Applications · 2025
01

Policy & Applied Research

Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Substance Use Disorder

Working Paper · 2025 William Chuang · Logarchéon Inc. Neuroscience · Public Health Policy

A unified mathematical framework for low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) neuromodulation targeting the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in substance use disorder, coupled to the λ-Stack as a real-time safety and control architecture. Situated against the current U.S. burden of disease: 48.4 million past-year SUD in 2024 (SAMHSA); 79,384 drug overdose deaths including 54,045 opioid-involved (CDC 2024).

The paper treats the first published clinical signal (Rezai et al., 2025: 91% mean craving reduction over 90 days, n=8, open-label) with appropriate discipline—as a mechanistically coherent preliminary signal warranting controlled confirmation, not as established efficacy. Core contribution: a mathematics-first safety, observability, and control architecture for NAc-targeted LIFU, with formal adverse-event analysis and transparent parameter reporting.

LIFU Safety Parameter Explorer

Interactive — adjust parameters; safety constraints update in real time

0.15
0.22
2
20
0
MI
lim 0.30
Φ_cav
lim 0.70
CEM₄₃
lim 0.10 min
ΔT (°C)
lim 1.0 °C

Identity Friction, Diplomatic Nomenclature, and Pastoral Strategy: Taiwan in Holy See–PRC Statecraft, 2026–2106

Working Paper · 14 March 2026 William Chuang Diplomatic Studies · Ecclesial Strategy · Taiwan Studies

A decision-analytic memorandum for senior ecclesial and policy principals whose remit includes Taiwan, China, the Holy See, or long-horizon institutional strategy. The governing question is strategic, not theological: does the Holy See’s current public diplomatic language about Taiwan create a measurable risk to Catholic mission, and if so, which course of action best protects Taiwan’s Catholic community while preserving engagement with China?

The paper distinguishes three often-conflated things: the Holy See’s legal position on sovereignty, its diplomatic terminology (e.g. “China (Taiwan)”), and how that terminology is received on the ground in Taiwan. It introduces explicit crisis criteria, a quantitative scenario model projecting baptisms under five strategic paths to 2106, and a threshold instrument answering how large China-side gains would need to be to justify Taiwan-side costs. Anchored in the “Poland argument”: Taiwan can serve as the free institutional base for a future China mission—but only if the Church first escapes the current 2% ceiling imposed by civic-register misalignment.

Live tracker

Capital Flows & Institutional Transparency

Research Tracker · Ongoing · 2026– William Chuang Financial Statecraft · Institutional Disclosure · Indo-Pacific Security

Maps confirmed capital flows between Western institutional investors and entities linked to PRC or Russia state structures through regulatory designations, audited financials, court records, and official corporate registries. Sources include SEC Form 13F and N-PORT filings, Federal Register publications, IRS Form 990 disclosures, Companies House and Swiss commercial register records, Vatican financial statements, and agency press releases. Only confirmed, documented holdings appear; inferences are tagged explicitly and withheld from primary tables.

Institutions covered: Knights of Columbus Asset Advisors (KoCAA), CommonSpirit Health, Ascension Health / Ascension Investment Management, HSBC Holdings, the Holy See (IOR, APSA, Peter’s Pence), and Aid to the Church in Need as positive control. The foundational policy document examined is the USCCB Socially Responsible Investment Guidelines (2021). Regulatory designation is reported as a fact of administrative record, not as a finding of wrongdoing against any investor.

Working Paper · 2025–2026

Governance Legitimacy Index — A Five-Indicator, Externally Verifiable Framework

Policy Analytics · Intelligence Studies · 2025–2026 William Chuang Comparative Governance · Applied Intelligence Tradecraft · ~195 Entities

Conventional governance assessments rely on self-reported approval surveys that authoritarian governments can suppress, fabricate, or selectively publish. This index substitutes five indicators whose primary data sources lie outside the scored government’s jurisdiction: emigration and wealth-migration flows (recorded by receiving countries), satellite-verified GDP fidelity (NASA/ESA nightlight data), excess-mortality transparency (EuroMOMO, WHO), economic misery (Hanke Annual Misery Index, Johns Hopkins), and foreign-exchange black-market premium (parallel rate indices). The composite score is expressed to one decimal place, ensuring every entity carries a unique rank. Approximately 195 sovereign entities are scored as of 2025–early 2026.

Key findings: Taiwan (95.4) holds the world’s lowest misery index (HAMI 2.1) and scores among the highest-legitimacy governed entities by any indicator combination. Russia (16.8) fails all five simultaneously. Venezuela (7.2) anchors the floor among nominally democratic states. The U.S. scores 82.4—reflecting structural institutional strength, not incumbent satisfaction. Includes an interactive dashboard with regional filters, a complete indicator table, and a 10,000-word country-by-country analytical commentary written at senior foreign-service and intelligence-community standards.

Historical study

中華 & 華人 — A Study in Name and Civilisation

Historical Study · 2026 William Chuang Sino-Catholic Intellectual History · Etymology · Indo-Pacific Identity

The term 中華 is the C in both the Republic of China (中華民國) and the People’s Republic of China (中華人民共和國). It is not an ancient ethnic label. It was assembled as a deliberate modern political category in the late Qing period by the Changzhou School of Thought (常州學派)—a five-generation intellectual lineage running from 莊存與 (1719–1788) through to Kang Youwei (1858–1927), the architect of the Hundred Days’ Reform— working from New Text Confucian hermeneutics to coin 中華 as a civilizational umbrella transcending Han ethnicity alone.

The study traces that construction from its philological and etymological roots (中 + 華 = not “the central race” but the central flowering), through nine centuries of Franciscan, Jesuit, and Portuguese missionary contact with the Jiangnan literati world, the Southern Ming Catholic court (Empress Dowager Helena’s 1650 letter to Pope Innocent X, preserved in the ARSI), the cruciform geometry of the character 華 and its convergence with the Jerusalem Cross, and the diaspora thread connecting Hong Kong, Lukong, Sun Yat-sen’s 香山, and Honolulu. Culminates in the entry of 中華 into the official names of both successor states of the Qing.

Protecting U.S. Scientific Cognition from AI-Enabled Replication Threats — A Three-Portion Framework

Policy Series · September 2025 William Chuang National Security Policy · AI Governance · Cognitive Science Policy Unclassified — Educational Reference

A three-part integrated framework addressing AI-driven scientific replication threats and law-bounded U.S. responses. Large language models (LLMs) and related systems are the primary vector examined. Portion I delineates PRC AI-assisted “scientific cloning”: centralized pipelines that learn from foreign research and redeploy results across dual-use vectors—with operational mechanics, translation pathways, and indicators for Western R&D exposure. Portion II outlines a law-bounded Manhattan-class architecture preserving U.S. scientific cognition under strict civil-liberties constraints, including opt-in Prospective Cognition & Tacit Pathways (PCTP), a Secure Compute Utility, and simulation-first Mirror Prototype Labs. Portion III provides the unified statutory backbone (CCSA), codifying lane separation, provenance-by-default ModelOps, and independent oversight with bright-line prohibitions.

Legal notice: educational planning concepts only. Any real-world activity requires explicit statutory authority, independent oversight, and compliance with U.S. constitutional, statutory, and international frameworks. Export-control regimes (ITAR/EAR/MTCR) may apply.

Artificial Superintelligence Architect — Logarchéon Core Architecture

Lecture Notes & Patent Portfolio · 2023–2026 William Chuang · Logarchéon Inc. AI Architecture · Mathematical Foundations · U.S. Patent Pending

The primary research output of Logarchéon: a mathematically rigorous proof that any scalable Artificial Superintelligence operating in the real world requires, at the architecture class level, three independent mechanisms — CEAS-class nonlocal coordination, Ψ-class causal operator inference, and GRAIL-class invariant geometric representation. The necessity claims are theorems, not assertions; each addresses an independent obstruction proved via graph theory, causal identifiability, and orbit coverage.

Materials include ~264 pages of graduate-seminar lecture notes (v18), a 94-cell Colab implementation (Tier-A v5), a 25-claim patent draft, and a complete ANI-vs-ASI certification checklist requiring triadic ablation and 20 closed-loop recursive self-improvement cycles. U.S. Provisional 64/067,703 filed; non-provisional in preparation. Portfolio: 9+ applications filed 2025 across ASI architecture, MIA, CEAS, operator-theoretic verification, and related methods.

NDA-gated technical brief and lecture notes available on request — founder@logarcheon.com

01b

ANI vs. AGI vs. ASI — Formal Comparison

ANI (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) — systems restricted to bounded tasks, including every current large language model (LLM). AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) — broad competence across most cognitive task families at adult-human level. ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) — exceeds the best human across most major cognitive domains, with robust transfer to untrained task families. The distinction is architectural and mathematical, not about benchmark scores or parameter count.

Table derived directly from lecture notes v18, §§ checklist, concrete-scenarios, synthesis.

ANI — Frontier LLMs
GPT‑4/5 · Claude · Gemini · all scaling‑law models
Logarchéon ASI Architect Seed
CEAS + Ψ-Operator + GRAIL triadic architecture
Causal reasoning
Observational correlation only — P(Y | X). Cannot distinguish correlation from causal consequence. Prompt wrappers do not change the underlying computation.
All four Pearl rungs: association, intervention P(Y | do(X)), counterfactual Yx′, and constrained inverse design. Ψ-operator implements do-calculus natively — not as a wrapper.
Geometry
Euclidean qk — coordinate-dependent. Exact orbit generalisation over infinite symmetry groups is impossible regardless of data volume. Theorem, not engineering limit.
GRAIL replaces the dot product with metric-invariant I(gq, gk) = I(q, k). Root: Einstein's general covariance — all physical observables must be tensors. Neural dot products qk are coordinate-dependent and lose information. GRAIL preserves every physically meaningful observable without loss of generality, in any coordinate system.
Global coordination
Local fixed-β attention. Coordination latency TN = Ω(N1/d) diverges with scale. No parameter increase removes this — proved unconditionally.
CEAS adds the one degree of freedom local attention structurally lacks: a collective channel φ(t) whose Jacobian contribution bc is dense across the entire computation graph. bi = how each node responds to the collective signal; ck = how each node contributes to it. Intelligence passes between any two nodes regardless of graph distance — system-wide coherence in one step.
Self-improvement
Weights frozen at inference. Frontier labs at RSI (Recursive Self-Improvement) Levels 3–5; autonomous closed-loop successor design (Levels 7–8) not publicly demonstrated.
Designed for a verified closed RSI loop: propose → implement → train → evaluate → verify → deploy. No manual edits inside the measured cycle.
Cross-domain transfer
Transfers surface distributional features. Succeeds when new tasks resemble training data. Cannot operate on domains it was not trained for.
Transfers structural operators to untrained domains — verified by pre-committed cryptographic hash of the hidden benchmark. Because transfer operates at the level of causal, geometric, and operator structure, the architecture can conduct intelligence analysis, strategic assessment, scientific discovery, and experiment design across domains it was never trained on. ANI cannot: it requires in-distribution data for every new domain.
ANI vs AGI vs ASI
Frontier systems are plausibly Emerging AGI (Rank 5) at most — not Competent AGI (Rank 6), not Expert AGI (Rank 7), not ASI (Rank 9+). Remarkable capability within training distribution; not general superintelligence.
Designed as an ASI Seed (Rank 10–12 trajectory). Current target: Level 4 — recursive triadic improvement over ≥20 verified cycles. Actual ASI additionally requires ≥10-domain breadth and self-improvement of the improvement process itself.
Failure mode
Returns a plausible answer regardless of whether a valid answer exists. Optimises text likelihood, not constraint satisfaction.
Returns an infeasibility certificate when no valid solution exists — backed by verified computation. Honest failure requires an actual constraint model.

ANI solves tasks. An ASI seed improves the process that solves new task families.

A system can score at the highest human level on every standard benchmark and still be ANI if it succeeds only within its training distribution. The distinction is whether it can intervene causally, generalise over symmetry orbits, and improve its own architecture inside a verified closed loop with a falsifiable audit record. — Lecture notes v18, §checklist

What is not ASI — lecture notes v18, §synthesis
  • Any LLM, however large, operating at observational-correlation-only causality
  • An agentic pipeline wrapping a correlation-based LLM in causal-sounding instructions
  • Advanced computing hardware without goals, world models, or causal agency
  • Superhuman performance in narrow domains only — ANI by definition
  • High benchmark scores with high scaffolding dependence — scaffolded performance is not autonomous intelligence
  • Claimed improvements not reproducible from logs, checkpoints, and pre-registered benchmarks
02

Mathematics

Hausdorff Dimension of Well-Distributed Schottky Groups

Research Paper · 2024–2025Geometric Group Theory · Hyperbolic Geometry · Selberg–Huber Number Theory
Explicit closed-form formula for the Hausdorff dimension of limit sets of well-distributed Schottky groups: dim ℋ(ΛΓ) = ln(2m−1) / reff, where m is the number of free generators and reff the effective translation length. Anchored in Bowen–Series expansion, symbolic dynamics, and ergodic theory. Extended to higher-dimensional hyperbolic spaces (Kleinian groups). Key result: every finitely generated convex-cocompact Fuchsian group can be approximated arbitrarily closely by a well-distributed Schottky group.

Geometry of ℍⁿ: Foundations, Group Actions, and Quotient Constructions

Lecture Notes · 2025Hyperbolic Geometry · Geometric Group Theory
Rigorous, example-rich framework for n-dimensional hyperbolic space, emphasizing model structures, isometry groups, and manifold/orbifold topology of Γ\ℍⁿ. Covers Fuchsian and Kleinian groups, limit sets, proper discontinuity, and metric completeness. Educational scaffold toward research-level understanding of geometric group theory and low-dimensional topology.

Critical Scaling in Hyperbolic Attention Mechanisms

Research Paper · 2024Machine Learning Theory · Statistical Mechanics
Comprehensive framework linking hyperbolic attention mechanisms to statistical mechanics, spectral theory, and fractal geometry. Explicit derivation of βc(δ,κ,𝒯) in terms of fractal dimension δ, curvature κ, and topological connectivity 𝒯. Key formula: βc ∼ exp(C(κ)δreff)/λmax(𝒯). Extends to Langlands correspondence and Lorentz adaptations.
03

Quantitative Finance

The full Ψ–Orbitfold Finance series (Sets I–IV, 14 papers) develops operator-theoretic foundations for markets: conditional-expectation projectors, Koopman/Perron–Frobenius operators, Dunford cycle/transient splits, and spectral pricing. Documented in full on the Ψ-Operator page. Selected highlights below.

A Ψ-Structured Reformulation of Stochastic Finance

Formal Write-up · 2025Operator Theory · Asset Pricing
Replaces SDE/PDE-first pipelines with a finite-machine operator view: learn a closed-loop decode Ψ, lift to T=ΠVΨΠV, split T=D+N, embed to returns, and do pricing/neutrality as orthogonal projections. Black–Scholes appears as semigroup spectral pricing; risk-neutral change is a positive conjugation that preserves certified cycles.

Operator–Projection Factor Models: A Ψ–Koopman Framework for Asset Pricing

Draft Technical Note · 2025Asset Pricing · Information Geometry
Unifies learned closed-loop state maps with no-arbitrage pricing. Establishes CAPM/FF as L2 projections, builds operator-informed factors from cycle modes, and proves Davis–Kahan-style stability for certified edits. Oracle inequality for operator-factor spans; market-neutral projectors; cycle-respecting bootstrap.
04

Faith & Identity

My intellectual formation is inseparable from Catholic faith and the traditions of its lay orders. 4th Degree Knight of Columbus (Fr. McGivney Assembly); auxiliary and provisional member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. The Taiwan–Holy See paper above is simultaneously a work of strategic analysis and of filial concern for the Church’s mission. The materials below belong to that same identity.

Identity Friction, Diplomatic Nomenclature, and Pastoral Strategy — see Policy section

Working Paper · 14 March 2026Taiwan · Holy See · PRC
Also catalogued in §01 (Policy). Written as a Taiwanese Catholic whose family has been in Taiwan for approximately four hundred years, tracing to the 1626 Spanish Dominican missions that preceded any Chinese civic overlay. Offered under the intercession of Our Lady, Blessed Gerard, and Saint John the Baptist—in the spirit of tuitio fidei et obsequium pauperum.

Plenary Indulgence as Adult Catechesis

Self-Study Manuscript · 2025–2026Sacramental Theology · Canon Law
Accompanies adult Catholics from first questions about plenary indulgences through Scripture, Trent, canon law, the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, and the 2025–2026 Jubilee. Moves in disciplined steps: biblical foundations, Council of Trent, Catechism, 1983 Code of Canon Law, and practical checklists for living the Church’s teaching in ordinary time. Tone is contemplative rather than sensational; faithful to the Magisterium. Includes an algorithmic “rule of thumb” for aiming at one plenary indulgence per day.

Rule of Life — Ignatian–Cistercian Inspired Lay Horarium

Devotional Guide · 2025Spirituality · Lay Vocation
A daily and weekly rhythm of prayer for a lay person inspired by Ignatian spirituality (especially the Examen and Suscipe) and the monastic balance of the Cistercian tradition. Includes a full weekday horarium, busy-day minimum, weekly Principle and Foundation practice, and a sacramental rhythm (~20 days). Times are recommendations, not rigid prescriptions.

Algerian as Tavern Inscription

Occasional Lecture · 2025Typography · Sacred Art · Catholic Aesthetics
Follows the Algerian typeface from early 20th-century foundries through glyphic “tavern sign” usage and Catholic contexts (from tequila bottles to parish doors), before asking what Vatican teaching on sacred art implies for putting a “bar font” on or near the altar. Includes the anagram note: ALGERIAN → EN A GRAIL → “in a grail”—playful word-geometry that resonates with the surrounding themes of glory and inscription.
05

Study Notes & Learning

Living documents and archived notes. The “What I Learned Today” log and associated materials represent ongoing independent study rather than finalized research.