Policy & Applied Research
Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Substance Use Disorder
A unified mathematical framework for low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) neuromodulation targeting the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in substance use disorder, coupled to the λ-Stack as a real-time safety and control architecture. Situated against the current U.S. burden of disease: 48.4 million past-year SUD in 2024 (SAMHSA); 79,384 drug overdose deaths including 54,045 opioid-involved (CDC 2024).
The paper treats the first published clinical signal (Rezai et al., 2025: 91% mean craving reduction over 90 days, n=8, open-label) with appropriate discipline—as a mechanistically coherent preliminary signal warranting controlled confirmation, not as established efficacy. Core contribution: a mathematics-first safety, observability, and control architecture for NAc-targeted LIFU, with formal adverse-event analysis and transparent parameter reporting.
LIFU Safety Parameter Explorer
Interactive — adjust parameters; safety constraints update in real time
Identity Friction, Diplomatic Nomenclature, and Pastoral Strategy: Taiwan in Holy See–PRC Statecraft, 2026–2106
A decision-analytic memorandum for senior ecclesial and policy principals whose remit includes Taiwan, China, the Holy See, or long-horizon institutional strategy. The governing question is strategic, not theological: does the Holy See’s current public diplomatic language about Taiwan create a measurable risk to Catholic mission, and if so, which course of action best protects Taiwan’s Catholic community while preserving engagement with China?
The paper distinguishes three often-conflated things: the Holy See’s legal position on sovereignty, its diplomatic terminology (e.g. “China (Taiwan)”), and how that terminology is received on the ground in Taiwan. It introduces explicit crisis criteria, a quantitative scenario model projecting baptisms under five strategic paths to 2106, and a threshold instrument answering how large China-side gains would need to be to justify Taiwan-side costs. Anchored in the “Poland argument”: Taiwan can serve as the free institutional base for a future China mission—but only if the Church first escapes the current 2% ceiling imposed by civic-register misalignment.
Protecting U.S. Scientific Cognition from AI-Enabled Replication Threats — A Three-Portion Framework
A three-part integrated framework addressing AI-driven scientific replication threats and law-bounded U.S. responses. Large language models (LLMs) and related systems are the primary vector examined. Portion I delineates PRC AI-assisted “scientific cloning”: centralized pipelines that learn from foreign research and redeploy results across dual-use vectors—with operational mechanics, translation pathways, and indicators for Western R&D exposure. Portion II outlines a law-bounded Manhattan-class architecture preserving U.S. scientific cognition under strict civil-liberties constraints, including opt-in Prospective Cognition & Tacit Pathways (PCTP), a Secure Compute Utility, and simulation-first Mirror Prototype Labs. Portion III provides the unified statutory backbone (CCSA), codifying lane separation, provenance-by-default ModelOps, and independent oversight with bright-line prohibitions.
Legal notice: educational planning concepts only. Any real-world activity requires explicit statutory authority, independent oversight, and compliance with U.S. constitutional, statutory, and international frameworks. Export-control regimes (ITAR/EAR/MTCR) may apply.
Artificial Superintelligence Architect — Logarchéon Core Architecture
The primary research output of Logarchéon: a mathematically rigorous proof that any scalable Artificial Superintelligence operating in the real world requires, at the architecture class level, three independent mechanisms — CEAS-class nonlocal coordination, Ψ-class causal operator inference, and GRAIL-class invariant geometric representation. The necessity claims are theorems, not assertions; each addresses an independent obstruction proved via graph theory, causal identifiability, and orbit coverage.
Materials include ~264 pages of graduate-seminar lecture notes (v18), a 94-cell Colab implementation (Tier-A v5), a 25-claim patent draft, and a complete ANI-vs-ASI certification checklist requiring triadic ablation and 20 closed-loop recursive self-improvement cycles. U.S. Provisional 64/067,703 filed; non-provisional in preparation. Portfolio: 9+ applications filed 2025 across ASI architecture, MIA, CEAS, operator-theoretic verification, and related methods.
NDA-gated technical brief and lecture notes available on request — founder@logarcheon.com
ANI vs. AGI vs. ASI — Formal Comparison
ANI (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) — systems restricted to bounded tasks, including every current large language model (LLM). AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) — broad competence across most cognitive task families at adult-human level. ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) — exceeds the best human across most major cognitive domains, with robust transfer to untrained task families. The distinction is architectural and mathematical, not about benchmark scores or parameter count.
Table derived directly from lecture notes v18, §§ checklist, concrete-scenarios, synthesis.
ANI solves tasks. An ASI seed improves the process that solves new task families.
A system can score at the highest human level on every standard benchmark and still be ANI if it succeeds only within its training distribution. The distinction is whether it can intervene causally, generalise over symmetry orbits, and improve its own architecture inside a verified closed loop with a falsifiable audit record. — Lecture notes v18, §checklist
- ✗Any LLM, however large, operating at observational-correlation-only causality
- ✗An agentic pipeline wrapping a correlation-based LLM in causal-sounding instructions
- ✗Advanced computing hardware without goals, world models, or causal agency
- ✗Superhuman performance in narrow domains only — ANI by definition
- ✗High benchmark scores with high scaffolding dependence — scaffolded performance is not autonomous intelligence
- ✗Claimed improvements not reproducible from logs, checkpoints, and pre-registered benchmarks
Mathematics
Hausdorff Dimension of Well-Distributed Schottky Groups
Geometry of ℍⁿ: Foundations, Group Actions, and Quotient Constructions
Critical Scaling in Hyperbolic Attention Mechanisms
Supplementary notes — Schottky groups and hyperbolic dynamics
- One-Step Thermodynamic Formalism
- Thermodynamic Formalism and Patterson–Sullivan Theory
- Asymptotic Behavior of Orbits in the Poincaré Disk
- Hyperbolic Flows and Isometry Prediction via Differential Equations
- Linking PSL(2,ℝ) to Geodesic Flow via One-Parameter Subgroups
- One-Parameter Subgroups
- Uniform Escape Rates in the Poincaré Disk
- On the Necessity of the Weaker Definition of Local Homeomorphism
- Simple Geodesics on Hyperbolic Surfaces: Theory and Applications
Modular representation theory notes (Prof. Lux seminar)
- Modular Representation Theory: Notes and Expansions
- Modular Representation Theory in Physical Systems
- Modular Representation Theory and Physics
- Modular Representations and Algorithmic Approaches: From First Principles to Advanced Theory
- Semisimple Algebras, Minimal Ideals, and Centralizer Duality
- Rickard Equivalences and Broué’s Conjecture
- Full list → What I Learned Today
Quantitative Finance
The full Ψ–Orbitfold Finance series (Sets I–IV, 14 papers) develops operator-theoretic foundations for markets: conditional-expectation projectors, Koopman/Perron–Frobenius operators, Dunford cycle/transient splits, and spectral pricing. Documented in full on the Ψ-Operator page. Selected highlights below.
A Ψ-Structured Reformulation of Stochastic Finance
Operator–Projection Factor Models: A Ψ–Koopman Framework for Asset Pricing
Faith & Identity
✝ My intellectual formation is inseparable from Catholic faith and the traditions of its lay orders. 4th Degree Knight of Columbus (Fr. McGivney Assembly); auxiliary and provisional member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. The Taiwan–Holy See paper above is simultaneously a work of strategic analysis and of filial concern for the Church’s mission. The materials below belong to that same identity. ✝
Identity Friction, Diplomatic Nomenclature, and Pastoral Strategy — see Policy section
Plenary Indulgence as Adult Catechesis
Rule of Life — Ignatian–Cistercian Inspired Lay Horarium
Algerian as Tavern Inscription
Study Notes & Learning
Living documents and archived notes. The “What I Learned Today” log and associated materials represent ongoing independent study rather than finalized research.
Ongoing learning log
- What I Learned Today — running log
- What I Learned: March 2023 – March 2024
- What I Learned: Summer 2023
Qualifying exam notes & seminars
- Qualifying Exam Notes (Google Drive folder)
- 2023 RTG Meeting Notes (Prof. Ning Hao)
- Notes on Double Coset Random Walks (Diaconis talk)
Older math projects
- Basics of Fundamental Group
- A Study on Hom-polytopes
- Applying the Method of Steepest Descent on Fisher Exact Test
- Conway’s Basic Theorem on Rational Tangles
- Hardy’s Proof of Uniform Distribution via Continued Fractions
- Archive of older notes (Google Drive)
- Detailed Records Prior to 2014